Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

A reduced court may not rule against a binding precedent, even though it feels that it is actually unjust; it could only express the hope that a higher court or maybe the legislature will reform the rule in question. In the event the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and desires to evade it and help the law evolve, it may well either hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts from the cases; some jurisdictions allow for any judge to recommend that an appeal be carried out.

In the event the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and move forward according to the regulation. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to really make it ideal into the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified through the decision on the here Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

With the foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order concerning cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more

In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year aged boy from his home to protect him from the Terrible physical and sexual abuse he had suffered in his home, and also to prevent him from abusing other children while in the home. The boy was placed within an crisis foster home, and was later shifted all-around within the foster care system.

Quite a few judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in placing the Petitioner's name on the ECL based to the criminal case are inconsistent with established legal principles. As a result, this petition must be allowed Read more

In a few jurisdictions, case legislation may be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.

Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by law." It truly is well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative on the regulation laid down via the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Therefore, the competent authority from the parent department on the petitioner as well as the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount on the petitioner and pay out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits on the petitioner to which he is entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority in the respondent can also be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits from the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability inside the matter, but couldn't be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request on the appellate court.

Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there could be one or more judgments specified (or reported). Only the reason for that decision from the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning can be adopted within an argument.

Criminal cases While in the common legislation tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. As opposed to most civil regulation systems, common law systems Keep to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their own previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduced courts should make decisions reliable with the previous decisions of higher courts.